Post by juthi52943 on Jan 6, 2024 5:04:59 GMT
Which was intended to ensure confidentiality when processing customer data. It was only allowed for an employee to have medications with him at the workplace, provided he presented a medical certificate confirming the need to take them during work. This necessity had to be additionally confirmed by the company doctor.
Other items, including other medications, were Job Function Email List to be stored in a public closet. filed a complaint with the data protection authority in this case, claiming that the employer was unlawfully processing health data, and that information about the medications taken by employees was legible to other co-workers.
Therefore, the supervisory authority imposed a fine of EUR , on the call center operator.The personal data protection breach identified by the supervisory authority consisted in sending a car insurance policy by e-mail by an insurance agent, the processor of Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń i Reasekuracji WARTA SA, to an unauthorized recipient, even though it was sent to the e-mail address provided by the customer. Penalty for WARTA SA.
Other items, including other medications, were Job Function Email List to be stored in a public closet. filed a complaint with the data protection authority in this case, claiming that the employer was unlawfully processing health data, and that information about the medications taken by employees was legible to other co-workers.
Therefore, the supervisory authority imposed a fine of EUR , on the call center operator.The personal data protection breach identified by the supervisory authority consisted in sending a car insurance policy by e-mail by an insurance agent, the processor of Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń i Reasekuracji WARTA SA, to an unauthorized recipient, even though it was sent to the e-mail address provided by the customer. Penalty for WARTA SA.